Tamora Pierce Wiki

Welcome to the Tamora Pierce Wiki! Want to edit and see fewer ads cluttering your screen? Consider creating an account and participating in our small community! Registered users will be able to edit pages, will only see ads on the community's main page, and more.

READ MORE

Tamora Pierce Wiki
 
Line 8: Line 8:
   
 
I know there are quite a few pieces of info from back when Sheroes was a thing... like Sacherell being Turomot’s great-nephew (I know she said this on there because it was my question she was responding to when she said it), that I don’t know if they’re cataloged anywhere else, and Sheroes is unreachable now to check. Perhaps we could have some kind of provision citation to denote that the info at one time was verifiable even though we can’t double-check it now? At least for the info that actually has citations (with the broken links). If there’s no citation for otherwise unverifiable info, I would remove it from the pages. [[User:Magewhisper|Magewhisper]] ([[User talk:Magewhisper|talk]]) 03:07, June 4, 2020 (UTC)
 
I know there are quite a few pieces of info from back when Sheroes was a thing... like Sacherell being Turomot’s great-nephew (I know she said this on there because it was my question she was responding to when she said it), that I don’t know if they’re cataloged anywhere else, and Sheroes is unreachable now to check. Perhaps we could have some kind of provision citation to denote that the info at one time was verifiable even though we can’t double-check it now? At least for the info that actually has citations (with the broken links). If there’s no citation for otherwise unverifiable info, I would remove it from the pages. [[User:Magewhisper|Magewhisper]] ([[User talk:Magewhisper|talk]]) 03:07, June 4, 2020 (UTC)
  +
  +
Yeah, I'd support a disclaimer. You know I've never been a fan of the constantly changing quasi-canon information anyway. We'd lose a LOT of pages if we deleted based on that broken citation. Like Binur Iliniat for one! Maybe we can be on the look out for Tammy's next Q&A and ask then. --[[User:Mk101|Madeline]] ([[User talk:Mk101|talk]]) 14:34, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:34, 4 June 2020

Petranne

Speaking of long-lost citations, does anyone know where she said that Petranne can't inherit the Kyprish throne because she doesn't have Haiming blood... I can't find anything on her tumblr, but I could have sworn that's where she originally said it. (She also seemed to make her tumblr non-searchable which is just great.) --Madeline (talk) 18:44, June 3, 2020 (UTC)

It’s searchable in the app. However, the only reference I found to Petranne was about Dove keeping her on to secure luarin support in the Isles. Magewhisper (talk) 22:56, June 3, 2020 (UTC)

Huh, I wonder where I've seen it then. It could be on one of those long-deleted Q&As that Random House did ten years ago, which is a shame! A lot of the quasi-canon information on here is owed to those Q&As. What do you think our policy should be for those situations? Some of the quasi-canon facts are cited, but when you click on the link it brings you to a different site, so they're clearly not active anymore. Do we still keep them on the wiki even if the citations can no longer be verified? Feelingdizzie, do you have an opinion on this too? --Madeline (talk) 01:56, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

I know there are quite a few pieces of info from back when Sheroes was a thing... like Sacherell being Turomot’s great-nephew (I know she said this on there because it was my question she was responding to when she said it), that I don’t know if they’re cataloged anywhere else, and Sheroes is unreachable now to check. Perhaps we could have some kind of provision citation to denote that the info at one time was verifiable even though we can’t double-check it now? At least for the info that actually has citations (with the broken links). If there’s no citation for otherwise unverifiable info, I would remove it from the pages. Magewhisper (talk) 03:07, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd support a disclaimer. You know I've never been a fan of the constantly changing quasi-canon information anyway. We'd lose a LOT of pages if we deleted based on that broken citation. Like Binur Iliniat for one! Maybe we can be on the look out for Tammy's next Q&A and ask then. --Madeline (talk) 14:34, June 4, 2020 (UTC)